Visit
Official Website

Fictron Industrial Supplies Sdn Bhd
No. 7 & 7A,
Jalan Tiara, Tiara Square,
Taman Perindustrian Sime UEP,
47600 Subang Jaya,
Selangor, Malaysia.
+603-8023 9829
+603-8023 7089
Fictron Industrial
Automation Pte Ltd

140 Paya Lebar Road, #03-01,
AZ @ Paya Lebar 409015,
Singapore.
+65 31388976
sg.sales@fictron.com

China's Rare-Earth Strategy Versus US Risks Backfiring

09 Jul 2019
China's Rare-Earth Strategy Versus US Risks Backfiring
View Full Size
China is now looking to boost its dominance over the rare-earth minerals needful for myriad tech products, in part through regulations designed to enhance high-end industries. By doing this, however, Beijing risks driving investment into the rare-earth industry of its trade war foe, the U.S.
 
China makes roughly 80% of global rare earths, used in many different products including smartphones and the motors of hybrid and electric vehicles. Amid concerns that Beijing is deciding on some form of export restrictions, prices of rare earths have jumped over the last few months.
 
The price of neodymium, primarily used in magnets, has surged 30% to $68.5 per kilogram since April, while dysprosium, also used in magnets, has risen 30% to $290 per kilogram in the same period.
 
Both materials are required. Neodymium increases magnetic force but its performance is reduced under high temperature. Since motors can run very hot, dysprosium is added to help the neodymium endure heat. As more electric and hybrid vehicles hit the market, demand for the minerals is expected to soar.
 
Given the importance of such minerals to industry and defense, Washington left out rare-earth materials when it raised tariffs to 25% on mostly all Chinese imports just lately. Analysts said Beijing is less likely to resort to the aggressive measures it has used in the past, lest it incur the U.S. wrath. 'China's attitudes and remarks are milder [this time] compared with when Beijing restrained shipments of rare earths to Japan in 2010,' said Kotaro Shimizu, chief analyst at Mitsubishi UFJ Research and Consulting.
 
That year, the U.S. tried out to bring back the mining of rare earths locally by introducing a bill, the Rare Earths Supply-Chain Technology and Resources Transformation, known as the RESTART Act. Even though the law failed to gain traction, Shimizu said, 'Now we see again the rise of voices calling for rare-earth production in the U.S.'
 
When Beijing restrained the exports to Japan, tensions between the countries had increased over the Senkaku Islands, which China claims and calls Diaoyu. At that moment, Chinese public opinion was 'all about how China can hurt Japan by leveraging rare earths,' Shimizu said.
 
But the clampdown came at a price for China. Facing an abrupt supply shortage and price spike, Japanese companies started to reduce rare-earth consumption and alternatively focused on recycling. According to the Japan Society of Newer Metals, the country's rare-earth demand fell to 13,197 tons in 2012 from 32,390 in 2007. 'Beijing still remembers that they put their own industry in a really difficult situation by restricting rare-earth exports in 2010,' said Yoshikazu Watanabe, president of Tsukushi Shigen Consul, a natural resources consulting company. 'China's moves now are for show and to remind the U.S. that it could restrict exports.'
 
Soon after the failure of the RESTART Act, prices in the U.S. market slumped for years and mining company Molycorp filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2015. American rare-earth production ceased absolutely from 2016 until last year, when the U.S. produced 15,000 metric tons, as stated by data from the U.S. Geological Survey.
 
The U.S. still is lacking capacities to separate rare earths. Ores obtained from Mountain Pass, the only U.S. mine under operation, are shipped to China, which has the most advanced separation technology. Beijing already imposed a 25% tariff on rare-earth ores from the U.S. that are sent to China for separation on June 1.
 
But endeavours are underway to fill the gap in the stateside supply chain. Australia's Lynas, the biggest rare-earth producer outside China, announced in May that it had signed an agreement with U.S. rare-earth processor Blue Line for a coordination to develop separation facilities in the U.S. Shigeo Nakamura, president of Advanced Material Japan, said the U.S. has alternatives for separation in Vietnam, Myanmar and Estonia. 'There will always be export pathways [available] to the U.S. through a third country,' he said. So Beijing is treading cautiously as it works to strengthen its position.
 
China's economic planner, the National Development and Reform Commission, said just lately that rare-earth producers should abandon low-end production methods by increasing investment and research to enhance the competitiveness of their minerals.
 
While waiting, Beijing in May began restricting imports of rare earths from Myanmar to stop smuggling. Myanmar produces dysprosium and terbium - known as medium-heavy rare earths that can be found in very few places on the planet. Large volumes of ores flow illegally into China; reportedly, as much as 85% of China's rare-earth imports come from Myanmar.
 
When it comes to actual components like rare-earth magnets, which are shipped to the U.S. mainly from Japan, the effects of the tensions appear to be negligible so far. Shin-Etsu Chemical, which produces the magnets, said the trade war 'hasn't had an impact on the production and shipments of rare-earth magnets.' The Japanese company imports rare-earth alloys from its Chinese subsidiary in Fujian in southeastern China and makes the magnets in Japan.
 
Nakamura at Advanced Material Japan suggested China risks a boomerang effect. 'The more Beijing tries to weaponize rare earths, the more development and investments the U.S. industry will attract,' he said. 'China will be the only one to lose out.'
 
Source: TRONSERVE

You have 0 items in you cart. Would you like to checkout now?
0 items